Home > Uncategorized > Government U-Turn opens door to experiments on lost pets?

Government U-Turn opens door to experiments on lost pets?

The UK Government’s implementation of a new EU Directive on animal experimentation threatens to weaken our already inadequate regulations. One area of acute public concern has been the question of whether experiments on stray/feral animals – including lost or stolen pets – will be permitted under the new regime. The answer to that depends heavily on the current rules, as the Directive allows countries to keep stricter existing measures, while hindering them from unilaterally passing new rules stricter than the Directive.

The Government is now desperately trying to give the impression that stray/lost pets will not be subjected to experiments, but is refusing to actually ban the practice. So what is going on?

Yesterday, Home Office Minister Lynne Featherstone issued a statement to the House of Commons which claimed that current UK legislation did not prohibit experiments on stray animals, and therefore the Government would have to ‘copy-out’ the relevant Article of the Directive into UK law. However, the Government could not ‘envisage’ allowing such tests and so there would be ‘effective prohibition’.  A Home Office email to animal protection groups has sought to reassure us and they seem suspiciously keen to move on from this issue!

At first glance this all seems reasonable, until you compare this with previous Government statements. The problem is, Featherstone’s statement contradicts the interpretation stated in paragraph 64 of the Home Office June 2011 Consultation Document, which asserted:

“This [Article 11] is a relaxation of the provisions of Directive 86/609/EC under which their use was prohibited. ASPA 10(3)(a) and (b) implements this prohibition through its requirement under Schedule 2 for animals of relevant species to be purpose bred and limitations regarding the use of wild animals.

Question: Is there a case on animal welfare gounds for retaining the current UK prohibition on the use of stray and feral animals, as permitted by Article 2?”

Given the Home Office’s equivocation on this issue – and in the absence of a clear explanation as to why the position has shifted – it is difficult to be confident about where the Government really stands.

If the Government sincerely wishes to ban the practice, why surreptitiously move the goalposts to give the impression that a ban can’t be implemented? The Home Office’s Consultation response (p.17, Article 11) last month gives a clue. It reveals that there was ‘limited support from the bioscience user sector for transposing Article 11 unchanged’.

So it appears that the Government has caved into demands by a small proportion of animal researchers to open the door to experiments on abandoned/stray dogs and cats, snubbing the call from just about everyone else (including many involved in animal research) to maintain the complete ban on such experiments.

There is a widespread and powerful commitment within the animal research sector to maximising their freedom to experiment on animals, by keeping the door open to all categories of experiment ‘just in case’ they want to perform them in the future, even if they and the Home Office can’t envisage it at the moment. Given stray animals are used in other developed countries such as the USA and Australia, UK animal protection groups are right to be wary of meaningless ‘intentions’ from a Home Office and their industry masters who are, in reality, facilitating such experiments rather than opposing them.

About these ads
  1. Nina bodros
    June 25, 2012 at 4:44 pm

    Outrageous …! Animal testing it is a crime to start with!!! We say no to this !!!

  2. J.E
    June 25, 2012 at 5:55 pm

    It makes me sick the cruelty done to animals in this world as the U.K used to be a leading nation as far as animal protection was involved but since the E.U its just a matter of do what we are told to do!Who are these people who have the power to decide whatever they want because of finacial gains animals suffering has increased are we on the way back to medievil times?I am angry!

  3. animal lover
    June 25, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    If the Government let use lost pets to the experiments the Great Britain will be send back to the Stone Age when no one’ s care about animals and what they can feel. This news got me really upset and sad.

  4. nipper1
    June 26, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    shocking insult to the brittish public let the nation decide not muppet mps in a room

    • June 26, 2012 at 6:26 pm

      Actually they’re not even allowing MPs to properly decide – the Government is fast-tracking the new law through Parliament. If MPs did get a say that would be a slight improvement on the Sir Humphreys!

  5. Izabela
    June 26, 2012 at 10:35 pm

    Hello,

    I addressed the letter and our concerns to my local MP’s.

    One of answers (unfortunately negative) – from XXX MP says: ‘I understand you wish for me to sign EDM193 to oppose the use of stray cats and dogs in experiments but as my role as Parliamentary Private Secretary to Lord Strathclyde, Leader of the House of Lords, I do not, by convention, formally support such campaigns, as doing so is likely to breach the Ministerial Code’s rules on collective responsibility’.

    I am strongly dissapointed with this answer….

    • June 27, 2012 at 10:27 am

      Unfortunately it is indeed the convention that Ministers, Junior Ministers and PPSs don’t sign EDMs unless they are official Government ones. However, your MP could still express a position and write to the Home Secretary about this. I would also suggest you could go and see your MP in person, that will have a much greater impact than a letter.

  6. rowson
    August 6, 2012 at 7:25 pm

    People just close their eyes to this cruelty because it is easier for them. I think as well as contacting their MP etc, people should send a copy of the information of what the Government is going to do to their local newspapers to be printed, so the barbaric information is not hidden just within the offices of Government but to be read by local normal people and thus further widespread ,resulting in more contacts to MP’s etc.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: