Home > Uncategorized > Nature undermines animal research debate

Nature undermines animal research debate

There’s an interesting feature in his week’s Nature on animal experiments. Unfortunately, the issue is set up with the usual ‘Violent extremists vs life-saving scientists’ format – a rather blatant attempt at positioning any and all critics of animal experimentation in a negative light. At the same time, the violence inflicted by animal researchers is denied.

Another recurring aspect of these skewed reports are the expressions of support for institutions developing ‘programmes to explain what goes on within their walls’. This does seem rather contrived given the selfsame institutions have habitually gone out of their way to conceal relevant information through intimidatory legal actions or spin. On the latter, the UK Information Tribunal concluded that the abstracts of research proposals written by researchers and published by the Home Office:

“… appear generally to adopt a style and tone intended to persuade the reader as to the value of the proposed experiments. This is in contrast to the style of the licence applications, which are more neutral in tone. This perception of a positive spin having been applied to the published information was increased by the absence from the abstracts of the detail about the experiments themselves.” 

Researchers need to develop a less elitist attitude and accept the public has an ethical and democratic right to ultimate control over their activities. Clauses in the new EU Directive may force more honesty, but the UK Government will no doubt do its best to implement these measures in as meagre way as possible.

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. A J Muskett-Geake
    February 28, 2011 at 10:58 pm

    whilst this sort of thing may have been appropriate ie didn’t know any better, in the past, it is so much more callous now that a) we know just how much pain and terror are inflicted, (er just what did we evolve from)and b) there are valid and suitable non animal alternatives. The same scientists that slam creationists for their “narrow” views also decry those that realise animals are wholly sentient, where on earth would we have developed our emotional array from , if not on the back of the creatures before us.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: