Home > Uncategorized > Why do ‘normal’ people do terrible things?

Why do ‘normal’ people do terrible things?

Last night I attended a great talk at Sheffield Hallam University by Dr Les Mitchell, entitled ‘Moral Disengagement and Support for Nonhuman Animal Farming’. It explored the various factors that promote violence towards animals, including humans. We need to understand these causes to build a truly just and flourishing society.

Les referred to the work of psychologists such as Milgram, Zimbardo and Bandura. Milgram was the guy who found that most ordinary people will obey an order by an authority figure to inflict an agonising and potentially lethal electric shock to another human. Zimbardo conducted the infamous Stanford prison experiment, where volunteers were split into a group of ‘guards’ and a group of ‘prisoners’. He found that the guards soon indulged in sadistic abuse of prisoners, not only because they had the power to do so, but because both guards and prisoners were ‘de-individuated’.

The guards’ anonymity eroded their sense of moral responsibility while the prisoners’ anonymity stripped them of their status as individual persons. Les also cited Hannah Arendt’s legendary phrase – ‘the banality of evil’ – that she used to describe the surreal ‘normality’ of those accused of genocide at the Nuremburg War Crimes Trial. The overarching point was that ‘societal channels’ encourage certain types of behaviour, such as moral indifference to the terrible abuse of non-humans in factory farming.

This means that those who participate in or acquiesce to appalling atrocities are not usually ‘monsters’. Humans are not the perfectly autonomous rational agents we often like to think we are. We are just another species of animal after all. While this should provoke reflection and undermine our delusion of moral superiority , it also demonstrates practical problems in achieving justice and respect for all sentient beings, given the obvious limits of appeals to human reason.

But, as Les pointed out, one strategy that can make a difference is challenging the euphemisms that are used to obscure violent abuse – for example when animal researchers say they ‘work with’ animals, rather than being honest about the pain and distress they cause to non-consenting individuals. Talking of individuals – asserting the individualism and personality of animals is also vital. They are not just numbers or units of production.

And we must evolve better societal channels – such as cultural norms and political institutions – that promote ethical ways of living rather than sustaining our brutal tyranny over other animals.

Advertisements
Categories: Uncategorized
  1. James W Kelsey
    April 13, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Glad to see someones giving some attention to these crucial issues,Thank you

  2. Cheryl Lawrance
    April 13, 2011 at 2:55 pm

    It does help to explain why perfectly normal human beings can turn a blind eye to the suffering of innocent animals. The idea of individualising an animal is the reason why it’s always hard to kill a creature with a name. It takes on a personality – becomes a pet. Remember the incident where the school children reared a pet lamb and gave it a name? Of course, for some of those kids, it was heart-breaking to know that the lamb would be sent to the slaughter house. I still haven’t forgiven that head-mistress – whoever she was! Poor kids! Traumatised for life!

    • MICHELLE LANCASHIRE ENGLAND
      May 15, 2011 at 11:19 am

      Neither have I Cheryl. I wrote to them but they didn’t seem to care.

  3. ros martin
    April 24, 2011 at 11:14 am

    Well, it has long been established that we “humans” have always been capable of “rationalizing” our actions – as long as there is someone or something we can dominate we will continue to treat them abominably; I believe the ability to become morally degenerate in our attitudes towards those weaker than ourselves surfaces when it suits us – that which is supposed to separate us from animals actually enables us to rule out any argument that doesn’t support our supreme survival; no one in their right mind condones the perpetration of torture and brutality towards men, women or children – but we seem capable of detaching ourselves from any culpability under certain circumstances – this ability to detach ourselves and “morally justify” our actions is very useful if we want to have the power of life and death over helpless, confused, and often very intelligent animals – whose same aim is simply to survive in this mad world

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: